2. The judgment of the defendant seems to have led to the confession and reflect of the crime of this case, and not to take part in the crime.

However, it is argued to the effect that the crime of running the gambling game room business requires strict punishment for the crime that promotes multiple gambling spirit and impairs the sound sense of labor, the defendant has been punished several times, including the previous offense of probation, and in particular, there are the records of punishment for the same kind of crime, and the defendant's community service order is excessive. However, considering the above defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and means of the crime, circumstances after the crime, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments, such as the above defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, it is reasonable that the court's punishment (two years of probation for October) against the defendant was conducted within the reasonable scope of discretion.

Defendant

The argument is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.