A and B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,00, and by a fine of KRW 300,000,000.

The defendants are the defendants.

Defendant A is engaged in the livestock industry, Defendant B is in the position of non-party B, and Defendant A and Defendant B are married couple.

1. On November 29, 2014, Defendant A and Defendant B met with H and their children, a community resident, in front of the G community hall located in F, G community center in the Syang-si on the following day: Defendant A and Defendant B sent to K residents of the J against the victim I and Nonparty B, and notified them of “the restoration of the portion of the land without permission for ownership and the prohibition of use of underground water for purposes other than the original purpose of cutting off the land.” The victim I and Nonparty H did not have a frien with Defendant B, and left the community hall, and they did not go to the right side of the victim I and Nonparty B, jointly with Defendant A and Defendant B agreed to talk about the public door sent from J to the victim I and left the right side of the village hall, and in order to talk about it and leave the right side of the village hall, Defendant A and Defendant B reached the victim’s kne on the right side of the knebal kne and knee in the front of the victim.

2. Defendant A’s property damage, on the same grounds as in the preceding paragraph at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, and on the same grounds as in front of the Defendant A’s husband and wife and the community hall, Defendant A kept a cell phone owned by the victim I to carry iPHHNE 4S, and carried the video with the victim’s hand in order to prevent the victim from taking a dynamic image, thereby impairing the victim’s iPHHNE 4S cell phone carried with the Defendant’s hand, thereby impairing the use of the repair cost equivalent to 2.70,000 won.

Defendants and victims H (W) of the 2015 High 222) were all living in one village, and Defendant A and Defendant B were married with each other, and the victim was working in the “J” located in the village, and the victim was only serving in the “J” located in the village. As to the reasons, the reason is that “the victim was in the wife of Defendant D, and thus, the victim did not work in the golf course.”