When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Defendant

At around 02:30 on July 14, 2019, the victim C'D's operation in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, the fact did not pay accommodation expenses. However, the fact stated that "the unmanned machine had already been paid accommodation expenses by free machines, and the unmanned machine had been erroneously paid," and that it was exempted from the above employee, and obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to the amount of the said amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Victim C summary statement;

1. Investigation Report - Application of CCTV photographs submitted by the victim, elCCTV photographs and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.