However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The Defendant is an employer who operates D’s “D” on the 3rd floor of Asan City C Building.

1. On March 19, 2018, the Defendant arranged sexual traffic by the aforementioned method against unspecified customers, including: (a) having them look at the place at the place of sexual traffic at the end of the said promise; (b) having them look at, or in, the customer’s sexual organ in hand; and (c) inducing them to engage in similar sexual intercourse by inducing them to talk with, or in, the customer’s sexual organ in hand; and (d) from January 19, 2017 to March 19, 2018.

2. A person violating the Immigration Control Act was prohibited from employing a person who has no status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities, but the Defendant employed F and E in a manner that allows F (F, G, E (E, and H students) to engage in the same manner as the above 1.3 and pays KRW 4 to 50,000 per customer, without the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities at the above establishment, on March 2018.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the police officers in relation to E, F, and I;

1. A written accusation;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (transfer of a suspect's disease in the Thailand), investigation report (Attachment to photographs at the time of crackdown);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Arranging of elective sexual traffic (the occupation of a sexual traffic brokerage business), Articles 94 subparagraph 9 and 18 (3) of the Immigration Control Act (the occupation of an unqualified foreigner) of the Immigration Control Act, and each choice of imprisonment with labor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The act of arranging sexual traffic for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of the Punishment of the Criminal Act is against the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing the sex, and the defendant's illegal employment of foreigners and running business, etc., and the nature of the crime in light of the contents of each of the crimes of this case is not weak. Meanwhile, the defendant in this case.