beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.11.04 2016고단4026

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was commissioned as an insurance solicitor from October 6, 2008 to January 23, 2009 from the third floor of the Daegu Jung-gu Life Insurance Co., Ltd. to be engaged in the insurance solicitation affairs.

On October 208, 2008, the Defendant did not have the ability to pay the insurance premium to a police officer, and the Defendant borrowed the name of the contract from his person who did not have the intention to buy the insurance or from the person who was introduced through his person or his person who was introduced through his person to enter into the contract as if he had actually purchased the insurance, and did not receive allowances from the victim company.

On October 20, 2008, the Defendant: (a) around October 20, 2008, to E, a member of the society after the society, “if only the name of the subscriber is lent, the premium will be paid on behalf of the policyholder; and (b) on the same day, from the D branch to E, set up related documents, such as a contract, as if the Defendant entered into a contract with the victim’s employees, as if he/she entered into a contract with flus savings insurance and flus savings contract with 207,700 in the future of the monthly paid-in premium and flus insurance contract with 207,700 in the future of

However, at the time of fact, E was only lent the name without the intention to conclude the insurance contract, and there was no intention or ability to pay the insurance premium continuously.

Ultimately, the Defendant, as above, by deceiving an employee in charge of the victim company, received KRW 2,715,767 from the victim company as an allowance for the conclusion of the above insurance contract, around November 25, 2008, and prepared documents related to the insurance contract from around 52 times until January 23, 2009, and received KRW 153,84,607 in total by submitting the documents related to the insurance contract to the victim company as if it had entered into a normal contract, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The defendant;