2. The fact that the judgment is contrary to the Defendant and the Defendant did not repeat the crime, and the fact that the amount of damage is relatively small is relatively less favorable.

However, in light of the applicable law of the instant crime, etc., the fact that the nature of the crime was poor, the victims did not recover from damage, and the Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of it even though it was under probation due to larceny, etc.

In full view of the above circumstances, such as the character, conduct, environment, etc. of the defendant, the punishment imposed by the court below cannot be deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.