On July 23, 2015, the Defendant, at around 14:12 on July 23, 2015, brought up one outside 100,000 won of the victim’s market value on the books in which the victim was placed in a classroom at the first-class 3 class of the I elementary school, and brought up one micro-mail chip (hereinafter “the victim’s smartphone, etc.”) located in the victim’s smartphone.

Accordingly, the Defendant stolen the property owned by the victim.

Although the defendant alleged that he/she had been found at the I elementary school in order to prepare G and a letter in the above facts charged, he/she did not steals the outer Hadrid, etc.

G put part of the data kept in the outer Hadrid back back back back to the Defendant’s computer while booming with the Defendant, and the Defendant requested G as necessary to teach and sent part of the data to the Defendant’s e-mail.

In addition, it was argued that the contact with G was cut off, and that it would bring about the demand of G to return the outer humd, etc., and it was not actually stolen and kept.

Judgment

G requests the return of the outer Had, etc. on July 30, 2015, the defendant would return the home address after finding the home address.

The Defendant sent the same item by e-mail on September 7, 2015, and arranged the relationship with the Defendant and attempted to stop contact, even if only the data within the “edufalsh Pool” stored in G’s outer Hadwards.

G In light of the fact that it seems that there is no reason to dismiss the Defendant, etc., the Defendant seems to have stolen G’s external humd, etc. as stated in the facts charged.

However, by record.