If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

On April 10, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud in the Changwon District Court Msan Branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the same day.

1. On March 2, 2012, the Defendant: (a) had no intention or ability to pay the drinking value; (b) had a DNA store operated by the victim C (the aged 49) in South-gu, Nam-gu, Mapo-si (Spo-si) on March 2, 2012; (c) had a 3.60,000 won of entertainment receptionist; and (d) had a Doctrine, such as one disease (the 17-year acid), and had a Doctrine, and had a Doctrine acquired economic benefits by failing to pay the drinking value.

2. The Defendant causing property damage, at the above time and place, destroyed the property in an amount equivalent to KRW 150,000 on the studio floor and damaged its utility on the ground that the said victim did not pay the drinking value and tried to report to the police.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of investigative reports (a copy of judgment) and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;