However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of CK5 cars.

On August 23, 2014, the Defendant driven the above K5 car with a 0.206% alcohol concentration around 00:10, while under the influence of alcohol on August 23, 2014, and proceeded with the intersection of the distance in front of the regular curriculum located in the Seo-gu Standing Central Office of Commerce in Seo-gu, Gwangju at a speed of about 50km each other among the three-lane roads of the Bank of Korea.

At night, it was difficult to view the vehicle at night, and there was a duty of care to prevent the accident by safely driving the vehicle in accordance with the new subparagraph, and even if there was a negligence in violation of the duty of care to prevent the accident, the part of the front part of the victim D(44 years old) driver's off the right side of the above K5 vehicle, which was sent under the new subparagraph from the right side of the vehicle of the victim D(44 years old) due to the negligence of failing to perform the duty of care, caused a chain collision that makes the back part of the victim F(48 years old) passenger taxi's front part of the victim F(F(F) passenger taxi, who was waiting for traffic on the opposite side of the road, receive the back part of the above K5 vehicle as the rear part of the above K5 vehicle.

The Defendant, by its occupational negligence, caused injury to the said victim D, such as damage to the fright base and power lines, etc., requiring approximately two weeks of treatment, and caused injury to the said victim F, such as the fright base, fright base, fright base, fright base, etc., requiring treatment for about two weeks, and the victim H (V, 27 years of age), who was on board the said G private taxi, and the victim I (V, 26 years of age), who was on board the said G private taxi, suffered injury by the said victim D, such as the fright base and tension, requiring treatment for about two weeks of treatment respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the actual state of the driver;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso of Article 3 (2) 1 and 8 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;