손해배상(자)
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 89,904,873; (b) KRW 3,000,000 to Plaintiff A; and (c) KRW 3,000 to each of the said money, from November 29, 2012 to May 2015.
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The facts are: (1) The mother of Plaintiff B, who is the Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the automobile C (hereinafter “Defendant”).
(2) On November 28, 2012, D, while under the influence of alcohol on November 19:10, 2012, D driven the front part of the E-vehicle, which was proceeding in the direction of the Seogu Daejeon-dong Office in Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-dong.
(3) The plaintiff A, who was on board the Chief Lighting of the defendant's vehicle due to the accident in this case, sustained the injury, such as the escape certificate of the conical signboard, the light signboard disability accompanied by the stale certificate.
(4) On November 30, 2012, Plaintiff A received medical treatment at the Daejeon Emblian Hospital at the University Daejeon. At the time, Plaintiff A stated that “I had a plplal and plplalated plucking plucking of 3-day clothes, with respect to the symptoms of the hospital, the symptoms of verting the verting part of spine.”
(5) As of the closing date of the instant pleadings, the symptoms, such as Plaintiff A’s damage to the scambane, etc., remains after the scam of scam and the scam of scams due to the scam of scam and the scamb
[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul evidence Nos. 2, the result of the Seoul Hospital's physical appraisal commission by the head of the relevant court, and the purport of the whole oral argument
B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case as the insurer of the defendant vehicle.
C. Limit of liability, however, the plaintiff A was aware that D, a driver, was under the influence of alcohol, and he was seated with the defendant's vehicle, and the above negligence of the plaintiff A contributed to the occurrence and expansion of the damage, thereby limiting the defendant's liability to 80% by taking this into account.
Plaintiff
The facts of the contribution to A's disability and the images of Eul No. 1 to No. 5 of the evidence No. 1, and this Court.