beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2013.08.08 2012고단1720 (3)

업무방해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

C. D is a subcontractor of the Moel under construction of E, and C and F are externally related villages, and F, G, H and the Defendant are members of the “Einception”, who are violent crime groups that act in the military area, and I introduced D to the above E so that they can be subcontracted for the Mour project.

E, around June 20, 2008, after entering into a construction agreement with JJ Co., Ltd. and, around June 10, 2009, while entering into a construction agreement with HJ Co., Ltd. to build telecom, the said J Co., Ltd. entered into a construction agreement with L Co., Ltd. to build the telecom, and the said L Co., Ltd entered into a construction agreement with L Co., Ltd. to C on the outer distance of the Macom.

After that, L, a building owner, had different opinions on the issue of construction cost, E and D, and waived the construction work for the telecom, and the building owner E awarded a subcontract to D on November 15, 2010 for the completion of the construction work for the telecom, but in addition, there was a dispute between E and D arising from the issue of construction cost.

On the other hand, upon the occurrence of the dispute over D and the construction cost as above, E agreed to lease the telecom to M on the condition that M performs the finishing construction work on the apartment building in the above construction, but C and D conspired to prevent the above telecom from normally working by using the F, the behavior commander of the "F" behavior commander of the violent crime group in the military area to prevent M from doing business.

On August 22, 2011, at around 21:52, the Defendant, as well as the employees of service companies in front of the above subcontractor, mobilized for the above C and D’s exercise of the right of retention, and assaulted the victim N(28 years old), who was the owner of E and C, to the person who mobilized the victim N(28 years old), and was using the victim’s face at one time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. N.N.