On May 14, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act (compact) by the Incheon District Court on May 14, 2014, and completed the execution of the said sentence on March 17, 2015.

around 01:00 on April 14, 2015, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, i.e., franchisa, which requires treatment for up to 21 days, on the part of the victim’s entrance part and head part, on the part of the alcohol disease, which is a dangerous object in the victim’s E (40 tax) that was disputed with the victim’s E (40).

around 17:20 on May 21, 2016, the Defendant damaged the victim G in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City “H”, which was operated by the victim G on May 21, 2016, to remove the glass entrance at the place where the noise was being drunk, so that the repair cost equivalent to KRW 150,000 is exceeded.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant by the court (2015 highest 6514);

1. Each legal statement of E and I;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. A photo of the damaged part;

1. A previous conviction: A criminal history inquiry, trial text, and suspect interrogation protocol for the accused [the victim E has made a relatively specific and consistent statement as to the circumstances in which the crime was committed from the police investigation stage to the present court (only the victim only stated dangerous articles used for the crime as beer’s disease, beer’s disease, etc.). The content of such statement is the part of the victim’s injury (the victim’s injury was the victim’s injury to the victim’s disease, the victim’s injury to the victim’s body, and the victim was the head of the back). This is consistent with the location of the victim’s injury, such as the mouth and two sides.

On the other hand, while the defendant was well aware of the defendant, he was faced with the victim's head in the process of the defendant's appearance and did not have any other assault.

c) argument;

In addition, the statements of witnesses I are consistent with the statements of witnesses I, and the statements of the investigation report made immediately after this case (in the event of violence).