However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 20, 2016, at around 09:15, the Defendant reported 112 at the convenience store “C” convenience store located in the Daegu Seo-gu, Daegu, and confirmed the circumstances of the instant case by the chief F of the police box affiliated with the fleet, police station, and police station, who called to the site at the site after receiving a report from 112, and responded to the defect that the Defendant confirmed the said D when, and attempted to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender, the Defendant committed assault at one time at the right direction of F with the damaged floor.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to F, G, and D;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the degree of violence and the violation of the law);