However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, who is a principal restaurant, victim E, and victim F with the Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu 1st floor, is a person residing in the first floor above the above building, and the Defendant made a lot of complaints because the ordinary victims used the public toilet.

1. Around 22:00 on July 8, 2014, the Defendant got off the victim E’s father and his father at the end of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 1’s day on the same day, resulting in the Plaintiff’s negligence due to the construction work of the wind-gu, and caused the Plaintiff to become up with the house of the victims by drinking.

Therefore, in order to confirm whether the victims were son, the victims were able to see the victim E, “gypt, Chewing,” and “the victim F,” “the son’s son, son’s son’s son’s son, son’s son’s son, son’s son’s son, son’s son’s son, son’s son’s son, son’s son’s son, and son’s son’s son’s son. However, the victims got out

Accordingly, the defendant insultingd the victims and abused the victims F.

2. At around 22:30 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) arrested a slope H, etc. belonging to the Seoul Mapo Police Station G District as an flagrant offender on suspicion of insult, etc. under the preceding paragraph; and (b) obstructed the lower part of the police officer on the 112th report handling of the police officer’s 112th report, and legitimate performance of official duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders, etc., who were seated in the front and rear seat of the patrol police officer and were traveling along to the G District.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements to H, F, and E;

1. Relevant Articles 311, 136 (1), and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution due to the act of violence with the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act.