“The third party is accused of embezzlement of KRW 21 million that he/she leased as a registration director during the 8-year period of “(State).” The third party was charged of embezzlement of KRW 21 million that he/she leased as a registration director at his/her own knowledge, and the ten-year period of remuneration was not appropriated for the reserve fund for the maintenance and repair of buildings.

The document containing “,” etc. (hereinafter “the document of this case”) was drawn up and sent by mail to 550 owners of H classification.

However, there was no accusation of the victims due to the suspicion of embezzlement, and there was no remuneration for the registration director of the G in charge of the dispute resolution committee.

The Defendant, as seen above, damaged the honor of the victims by openly pointing out false facts.

2. Determination

A. Therefore, first of all, the defendant was accused of the victims' embezzlement charges in the instant document.

However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, it is recognized that the document of this case contains the following facts: (a) the lease management company of the " shopping mall", including the share I 44 per cent; (b) the two-storys and the five-storys of the two-storys and two-one millions of the five-storys were charged for embezzlement.

However, according to these statements, some unclear parts exist, but the phrase alone is interpreted as the leased management company of the shopping mall, rather than the victims, the object against which the defendant accused accused of embezzlement was accused of embezzlement. Such interpretation appears to read, “The fact that he embezzled rent (including deposit money) 21 million won for his 4 old unit (2 floor and 5 floor) and received the charge of embezzlement and embezzlement of the Fund,” which is written in the document stating “1.2 billion won from the same day.”