beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2014.08.21 2014고단144

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반등

Text

Defendant

A, B, and D are punished by imprisonment of 8 months, by imprisonment of 10 months, by Defendant C, by imprisonment of 1 year and 6 months, and Defendant F.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

F On January 24, 2014, the Cheongju District Court sentenced 8 months to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry and the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc., and decided on February 4, 2014.

[2014 Highest 144]

1. Defendant D, C’s violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act, and the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc., are conspireds with the Defendants, and Defendant D invested funds required for the operation of the game room, Defendant C shared the role of soliciting customers outside the game room and taking part in the role. From July 4, 2013 to July 5, 2013, it is obvious that the game classification of “sea-to-sea game” was refused from the Game Rating Board’s game in the game site without trade name in which the game rating committee was denied from July 4, 2013 to July 5, 2013.

10% of the points acquired by customers while putting cash in a game machine and making a game into money was exchanged in cash after deducting 10% of the points acquired by them as commission.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to provide customers with the unclassified game products and exchanged the results obtained through the use of game products as a speculative entertainment instrument, and conducted speculative businesses that give property benefits or losses according to the incidental results during the business period.

2. Defendants A, B, and C’s criminal conduct of conspiracy in violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc., Defendant A invested funds necessary for the operation of the game room, Defendant C is willing to attract customers outside the game room, Defendant B shared their respective roles to manage and settle customers in the game room, and Defendant B shared their respective roles from August 15, 2013 to August 18, 2013.