In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fines, only 100,000.

Defendant

A is the owner of a two-wheeled automobile, EC390, and Defendant B is the owner of a Froter car.

Defendants are related to the personal relationship.

When the Defendants were unable to subscribe to self-insurance due to the history of the existing accident, even though Defendant B-owned street cars were high-priced import sports cars, the Defendants conspired to receive insurance money by receiving the automobile accident insurance policy of the insurance company to which Defendant A was subscribed, under the pretending that Defendant A was aware of the occurrence of the accident that caused damage to the car while driving the said two-wheeled automobile.

Accordingly, on October 19, 2015, Defendant A was parked a two-wheeled automobile in the vicinity of the second park located in 22:00 Haakdong 22:00 at the call center(154-014) around 11:38 at the KB Non-Life Insurance (State).

F An automobile compensation receipt was made to the effect that the Fros car was used and damaged by the logs car, which would cause damage to the other vehicle.

However, the fact was that Defendant A was damaged by Defendant A, around October 18, 2015, around 22:00, in the vicinity of the two fixed parks located in the B-dong, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu., and the street car owned by Defendant B was over the upper part of the street car.

Nevertheless, on November 9, 2015, the Defendants made a false statement, and then acquired it by deceiving the Defendant B from the Victim KB Non-Life Insurance Co., Ltd. to pay KRW 8.5 million insurance money in the name of the repair cost of the vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. A vehicle operating manual and a written confirmation of the victim;

1. A written receipt of automobile compensation, inquiry into automobile insurance contracts, and requests for payment of automobile insurance proceeds;

1. Data, etc. on lawsuits and civil petitions;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to communications data replies, communications confirmation replies, investigation reports (A currency details analysis reports);

1. Article 347(1) and 347 of the Criminal Act provides that the Defendants of the pertinent legal provision and the type choice regarding criminal facts shall be the Defendants.