If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On September 24, 2012, the Defendant, at around 17:28, driven a Crenk car volume, which is the Defendant’s possession, and she was driving at the speed of 40 kilometers a speed of 40 kilometers a speed from the direction of the home-plug in the direction of a locker direction while driving at the speed of 40 kilometers a speed of 3 lanes a speed of the city in the direction of the home-pller. The driver, as the driver, neglected the driver’s duty of care to prevent the accident by driving the signal at the intersection in accordance with the signals, while he neglected the driver’s duty of care to prevent the accident by driving the signal in accordance with the signals as the signal apparatus is well reported to the intersection, while driving the EL125 of the victim D (61 years old and south) who opened the intersection from the right-hand direction to the left-hand signal, and failed to keep the right-hand side of the driver’s vehicle and shocked the part on the left-hand side of the Defendant’s front side.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury, such as a cage cage cage cage at the left-hand side, which requires six weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the person involved in the D traffic accident;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of a report on the actual situation, and related photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;