A. B, as a public worker belonging to the Defendant’s environmental forest and public forest, around 09:0 on June 26, 2014, around 09:0, 2014, she was going from the beginning of the beginning of the road in front of the Shinyang-gun’s Sylle, Gosari-gun’s Sylle, but he was inflicted an injury on the Plaintiff, such as cutting off the Plaintiff’s left hand and left part of the air and left part of the cement, cutting off the left part of the left part of the balance, cutting off the left part of the left part of the balance, and the opening of the left part of the road.

(hereinafter referred to as "the accident of this case". (b)

The Korea Labor Welfare Corporation recognized the instant accident as an occupational accident, and paid the Plaintiff KRW 48,824,300, totaling KRW 12,782,10 of the medical care benefits, and KRW 25,614,270 of the disability benefits, as an industrial accident compensation.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 11 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts and evidence as seen earlier prior to the occurrence of the liability for damages, B is liable for tort that caused injury to the Plaintiff by using the towing machine, which, although it is well-known that there is a person in the surrounding area, maintained a safety distance, and used the towing machine with care to use the towing machine safely, caused the Plaintiff to run a work in the surrounding area due to his negligence. The Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages inflicted upon B as an employer with respect to the performance of his duties.

The defendant asserts that the defendant's liability should be limited since the plaintiff's negligence competes with each other and the accident of this case occurred. However, the defendant's assertion and submission evidence alone cannot be viewed as any negligence or error in the occurrence of the accident of this case or the expansion of damage, and therefore, the defendant's limitation of liability or comparative negligence

Rather, the underlying facts and evidence mentioned above are presented.