1. On May 25, 2016, the Defendant invadedd a structure: (a) the opening of the door was set up in the “E” dog page of the victim D’s operation in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, for the reason that the opening of the door was sleeped by the night slicking and slicking the door; and (b) the Defendant intruded the victim’s structure.

2. The Defendant: (a) discovered any of the joints of the above joints of the dogs at the time and place specified in paragraph 1; (b) laid up three times to 2 strings by gathering the stone in the joints of the dogs; (c) set up the door door so as to close the entrance door, thereby causing the damage to the part of the Defendant’s Kenya; and (d) damaged the door door door.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the third public trial date);

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. The application of CD 2 (Cinematographic Recordings) and statutes on damaged photographics;

1. Relevant Article 319 of the Criminal Act, Article 319 of the Criminal Act (1) (the point of intrusion on a structure), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Penalty of one million won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Sentence (Article 59(1) of the Pronouncement of Sentence (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) reflects mistake while making a confession of all the crimes of this case; there is no record of criminal punishment; the Defendant reimburses the victim of the amount of damage after the prosecution of this case; the victim has agreed to compensate the victim; the victim does not want the punishment; the Defendant’s age