2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff is a terrestrial broadcasting company that operates broadcasting business and cultural service business throughout the country as a broadcasting zone and viewing right, and the Defendant A is the issuer of “C” (C), an Internet newspaper, and the Defendant B is the reporter belonging to “C.”

B. The Plaintiff reported from the EBC “G” program to the EF, a series of news reports pertaining to the MBC MBC’s MBC’s MI immediately before H’s death (YJ).

C. As to this, Defendant B drafted the instant article as indicated in attached Table 1 below the smaller title called “K” and “L” as the largest title on April 13, 2015, and Defendant A posted it in the column of C’s website.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 3, 8, and 9; the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. In the article of this case, the Defendants asserted that: (a) the Plaintiff faithfully reported the suspicion of connection between H and N with H and N’s freeboard fund; (b) the Plaintiff: (c) the Plaintiff faithfully reported the instant article that “terrestrial had caused damage to P and M’s freeboard illegal fund; and (d) MBC did not mention the suspicion of illegal freeboard fund and N in MBC’s freeboard; and (c) the Defendants reported that MBC did not mention that J is an issue of freeboard fund but did not contain any special content; (d) the Plaintiff reported that the Plaintiff was aware that the Plaintiff had caused damage to the connection between H and N’s illegal charter fund; (b) the Plaintiff had faithfully reported the relationship between H and N’s government in a balanced and neutral manner; and (e) had the Plaintiff received two special amnestys from PBC prior to the implementation of the PBC’s free investigation right.

MBC G was very serious in that it led a specific direction beyond simple transmission;

From the LbC LbC’s LbC’s LbC’s suspicion and N.