beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.11.20 2013고단6554

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등

Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of 20,000,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. From May 13, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) is a person who operates a place of commercial sex acts, namely, “D” from May 13, 2013.

At around 22:00 on May 13, 2013, the Defendant: (a) received 80,000 won from the male on the name omitted from the Internet site advertisement, and (b) assisted female employees E to engage in similar intercourse with a man’s sexual organ by hand; and (c) around that time, from around 29:00 of the same month to around 17:00 of the same month in the same manner as the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

B. On December 2012, the Defendant violated the Personal Information Protection Act: (a) obtained an external storage device (USB) that contains personal information, such as police officers’ pictures, names, contact numbers, etc. from a police officer of the Incheon Regional Police Agency, which was working in the control department of police officers, etc. at the office of a G sexual traffic business establishment located in the Masan-si, Ansan-si; (b) provided a total of 379 police officers’ personal information on two occasions, such as receiving police officers’ photographs, contact numbers, etc. in the same manner in front of the Ansan-si, Ansan-si; and (c) continuously provided a police officer with personal information on two occasions, such as receiving police officers’ photo, contact numbers, etc. from police officers in the same manner in front of the Ansan-si, Ansan-si.

Accordingly, the Defendant received personal information from police officers who provided H without the consent of the subject of information with the knowledge of the situation.

2. Defendant B, as well as Defendant B, was employed by Defendant A, who had operated “D” business on condition that customers receive KRW 50,000 (1 hour) and KRW 60,000 (1 hour and 30 minutes) on May 29, 2013 under the employment of Defendant B, who received KRW 60,000 from customer I for the same place as the above 1-A and 208 at around May 29, 2013.