2. The facts charged in this case are recognized, and a considerable number of victims are returned to the victim. However, even though the defendant is recognized, the defendant was sentenced to four times of punishment due to theft and robbery, etc., the defendant was punished by a fine by committing larceny at least six months since he was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for special robbery in three years and six months since he was released from prison due to special robbery, etc., and the defendant committed the crime in this case again before the period of repeated crime expires. The defendant was detained in this case, and the defendant seems to have no good mind, such as being subject to disciplinary action by assaulting a prisoner of the same prisoner while living in prison due to the detention in this case, and it is not recognized that the punishment of the court below is too unreasonable considering all the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relations, and circumstances after the crime. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit. Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.