근로기준법위반등
All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.
1. The Defendant is an employer who employs ten full-time workers and operates a construction business as the representative director of C(A) of the building B at the time of Kimpo-si.
The Defendant, at the foregoing workplace around March 15, 2014, worked from around May 4, 2009, did not pay KRW 93,756,773 of the total wages of nine workers within 14 days from the date of retirement without agreement on the extension of the due date between the parties, as stated in the attached list of crimes, including KRW 3,416,00 of the wages of KRW 3,416,00 of the retired workers D, and KRW 928,220 of the annual settlement refund, KRW 15,862,152 of the retirement pay, and KRW 23,62,372 of the retirement pay, as stated in the attached list of crimes.
2. Determination of applicable provisions of Acts: Article 109 (2) of the Labor Standards Act, the latter part of Article 44 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act, and subparagraph 6 of Article 327 of the Criminal Procedure Act (workers shall indicate their intention not to impose punishment after the institution