자동차관리법위반
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds of appeal (misunderstanding of facts) determined otherwise by the lower court, even though it was difficult for the Defendant to intentionally identify the registration number plate by intentionally tuting the number plate of the instant passenger vehicle operated by the Defendant on two occasions.
2. In light of the circumstances stated in its holding, the lower court determined that the Defendant, based on the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, had the Defendant spreaded a test color excess, which combines the registration number number of the number plate of this case on two occasions, or applied a test color and Melel on the white background of the number plate.
In order to make it difficult to identify the number of the instant number plate intentionally, he/she was in excess of his/her color.
For reasons that it is difficult to recognize the defendant, the defendant was acquitted.
Examining the judgment of the court below in comparison with the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the above judgment of the court below is just, and there is an error of law by mistake of facts as alleged by the public prosecutor.
shall not be deemed to exist.
The prosecutor's assertion is without merit.
3. The appeal by the conclusion prosecutor is dismissed.