beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.02.03 2016고단126

업무방해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 30, 2015, the Defendant, such as public electronic records, acquired the management committee, which will engage in manufacturing and processing of materials and components for display, and changed its trade name to the management committee of the dispute settlement committee and operated the said committee to the management committee of the dispute settlement committee on the 30th day of the same month, the Defendant agreed that he/she will give priority to purchase to the management of the former management committee when the F committee of the dispute settlement committee sells, divides or merges with another company, and that he/she will receive a letter of resignation from the directors.

“Along with the foregoing, G et al., received and kept a letter of resignation, the use of which is specified in the sale of the OLD business, etc. of the F in the other place.

Nevertheless, from the end of July 2015 to the end of G in order to dismiss the defendant, who is the representative director, due to the dispute over the management rights of the Fund in the Dispute Settlement Bank. On August 3, 2015, the defendant filed an application for the registration of resignation with G by convening a meeting of the board of directors of the Fund in the Dispute Settlement Bank and to dismiss the defendant, who is the representative director.

Accordingly, a registered public official who is not aware of his/her name shall enter the same official electronic records as the corporate registry of the FF in the form of a corporation in which he/she is unable to know the fact in the form of a computerized entry into the electronic records so that the resignation registration for resignation is completed on July 30, 2015.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false report to the public official, and made him record false facts in electronic records identical to the corporate registry.

2. On August 3, 2015, the Defendant, such as an electronic record of a false entry, had the Manam registry located in the Manam-si, Sungnam-si keep and exercise the same electronic record as the corporate registry on which the fact of insolvency is recorded, as described in paragraph 1.

3. The defendant shall be the defendant at the time and place described in paragraph 2, and shall be the F.