When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 24, 2017, the Defendant was operated by C on the front road located in Daejeon Seosung-gu, Daejeon on October 24, 2017.

D) On the ground that the taxi expense was higher than 200 won after having boarded at the above taxi and arrived at the above place, the Defendant changed the vehicle number of the above taxi to the above C and the above C and C were only frighting the Defendant’s arms or frighting the Defendant’s bank, but according to the black stuff image, it is confirmed that C was frighting the Defendant’s arms or frighting the Defendant’s bank, and it is confirmed that C’s frighting the Defendant’s arms or frighting the Defendant’s bank, and that there is no risk that the identity of the facts charged may be recognized and the Defendant’s exercise of the Defendant’s right to defense. Therefore, it is determined that “The above C and C had no physical contact,” without going through the amendment procedure, and “It was found that the said C and C were frighting the Defendant’s arms, or that C and made a statement to the effect that C were sent to the police station for criminal punishment on 15 occasions.”

As a result, the defendant filed a false report with the police station C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the witness C;

1. The list of cases to be reported, the statement of the accused, the protocol of examination of the police officers against the accused, and the official questioning of the Seo-gu Daejeon Metropolitan City;

1. CCTV CDs (C-Wearing Track) [Defendant reported on October 24, 2017, on the day of the instant case to the effect that “the taxi fee was unfairly resisted, and the Defendant made an abnormal behavior to attract,” and on the same day on the same day (Evidence No. 27 pages).