A. The Defendant, at the time of the instant case, found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in the instant case by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment, despite the fact that the Defendant did not have a kneee, as recorded in the facts charged in the instant case, since he was knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee of the Defendant.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (three years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. On May 1, 2012, the lower court consistently stated that the evidence duly adopted and examined on the assertion of mistake of facts (except for the police statement of F without the signature and seal of the person making the statement), namely, ① on May 1, 2012, which was after the date of the instant case, the victim stated that “Iber (the Defendant) seated on the front knee of the Defendant, seated the victim, kneeing the victim, and reported the victim’s well-being at the time,” and that the victim brought a loss on the Defendant’s act with a negative part at the time.

폈다 하는 행동으로 보여주었으며, 피해를 당했을 때의 느낌에 관하여도 “속상하고 기분 나빴다”고 진술한 점(진술녹화 당시 신뢰관계인으로 참석한 피해자의 어머니는 피해자의 진술에 끼어들거나 사건에 관련된 진술을 하는 등으로 피해자 진술에 어떠한 영향을 미치려고 한 것으로 보이지는 않는다), ② 진술녹화 당시 참여한 위 원스톱지원센터 소속 범죄심리사인 H는 피해자가 그 나이 또래에 맞게 자신의 관점에서 피해 사실, 피해 장소와 시간, 피고인을 만나게 된 경위 및 피해 당시의 기분 등에 관하여 전체적으로 일관되게 진술하여 피해자 진술에 신빙성이 있다고 분석한 점(수사기록 105∼111쪽)...