However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 03:00 on March 18, 2015, the Defendant assaulted the victim, i.e., the victim D (V, 18 years of age) without any justifiable reason, by putting the victim’s head head debt up, 2 times the left knick, and walking 3-4 times on the part of the knick.

2. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act by receiving a report from the police officer on the date, time, place, and 112 regarding the above assault, and received a request for identification from the police officer called out, and by speaking the Defendant’s resident registration number E (F) of the Defendant’s private village E, and used another person’s resident registration number unlawfully.

3. On March 18, 2015, the Defendant drafted a written confirmation of the arrest of flagrant offenders in relation to the instant assault case at the Eunpyeong Police Station H District of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul around 03:40 on March 18, 2015, and submitted the written confirmation of forgery to Nonparty E, who is a private person, and a slope I belonging to the said district group, as if the written confirmation was duly prepared.

As a result, the suspect has forged a letter of confirmation in the name of E, which is a private document related to rights and obligations for the purpose of exercising it, and exercised it.

4. On March 18, 2015, the Defendant, at the criminal office of Eunpyeong Police Station in Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul, with the joint signature of 07:19 on March 18, 2015, under the joint signature of Eunpyeong-gu, the Defendant was examined as to the crime of the above assault, and the Defendant was requested by the head of the J police station to prepare a column for the statement of the person who made a statement in the suspect interrogation protocol, “E,” and submitted to the said J as if the written protocol for the interrogation of the suspect stating the forged E was duly prepared.

Accordingly, the defendant forged E's signature for the purpose of exercising it, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement with D 1.