특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On October 7, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Incheon District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unnecessary Measures after Accidents), etc., and the above judgment was finalized on October 15, 2015.
【Criminal Facts】
The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a passenger car even in B.
1. On June 26, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act, the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) and the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, and the Defendant driven the said vehicle without being covered by mandatory insurance without obtaining a driver’s license within approximately 20 kilometers from the front of the residence of D, a part of the society located in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, to the FY-gu E, Incheon Jung-gu, without obtaining a driver’s license within the area of about 20 kilometers.
2. On June 26, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, violation of the Road Traffic Act (Measures Taken after Accidents), and the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes") and the Defendant were straighted at a speed of approximately 50 kilometers a speed of about 50 kilometers a speed of 50 kilometers a speed, one of the four-lanes in the direction of the airport, in the direction of the city, from the direction of the city.
At the time, the said intersection was in the eight-lanes in which traffic is controlled by signal apparatus and the two-lanes in shuttle and shuttles, so the person operating such a place was at the same time, and there was a duty of care to prevent traffic accidents by properly operating the steering gear and the brakes.
Nevertheless, while neglecting this, the Defendant, as described in Paragraph 1, was driven by the victim G (the age of 40) who was waiting for a straight-line signal in the front section of the Defendant’s vehicle due to the occupational negligence while driving the said vehicle while under the influence of alcohol as described in Paragraph 1, and was also driven by the Defendant as the front part of the car.
In the end, the defendant committed such occupational negligence with the above victim.