When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On September 17, 2013, around 16:25, the Defendant driven the above van on the road near the green 83-1, Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and proceeded at a speed of 10km in the direction of the Eunpyeong-gu Office in the direction of Eunpyeong-gu.

Since a crosswalk is installed on the front side, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving service has a way to reduce speed and effectively see the front side, and to prevent the accident in advance by safe driving.

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인은 이를 게을리 한 채 피해자 C(3세)가 횡단보도를 씽씽카를 타고 우측에서 좌측으로 횡단하는 것을 발견하지 못하고 그대로 진행한 과실로 피고인 운전의 위 승합차 앞 범퍼부분으로 피해자의 몸통을 들이 받아 위 승합차 밑에 넘어지게 하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as double ducts, which require approximately four weeks of treatment, due to such negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Each statement of E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each traffic accident report, actual survey report and diagnosis report;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant Acts concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. 주장 피고인은 피해자를 들이받아 넘어지게 하여 상해를 가하였으나 피해자가 씽씽카를 타고 갑자기 뛰어들어 피고인 운행 차량의 옆 부분을 들이받게 된 것으로 피고인에게 과실이 없고, 피해자가 당시 씽씽카를 타고 횡단보도를 건너고 있어 교통사고처리특례법 제3조 제2항 단서 제6호의 보행자라 할 수 없다.

2. First of all, the defendant.