However, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 17, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of five months for a violation of the Door-to-Door Sales Act at the Ulsan District Court, which became final and conclusive on December 16, 2017.

On October 2013, the Defendant made an investment in the “FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFYYYYYYYYYYYYY.

Private village E has commercial buildings in Kimhae-si F, and it was intended to create a golf practice site by lending the building.

He decided to make investment in the private village G-do, and also is expected to invest KRW 100 million.

If you invest a total of KRW 150,000,000 in the golf practice course business, it will pay dividends of KRW 4,00,000 per month in addition to interest.

“The victim received a loan as security from the victim’s real estate owned by the victim, the victim would have invested KRW 150 million in the golf practice hall business.

Since then, on February 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the Seoul Special Metropolitan City branch office in Ulsan Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on February 25, 2014, “A Co., Ltd., Ltd., a domestic corporation, has received a loan under the name of Yong-Nam, a university professor, and (b) has to pay interest in arrears; and (c) has to pay a monthly rent for an officetel in which he had been living in the Republic of Korea, and (d) has borrowed money to B before commencing the golf practice hall business. In order to obtain the loan, the Defendant would pay 8 million won of the secured debt of the right to collateral security (e.g., a total amount of KRW 50 million) on behalf of the Defendant. It was written with a loan certificate of KRW 50 million until March 30, 2014.

It is expected that the Republic of Korea will receive KRW 50 million in return for the loan of H's construction business license.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, at the time, the Defendant had a debt amounting to KRW 60 million to KRW 70 million to financial institutions. The Defendant had a debt amounting to KRW 130 million to the Defendant’s wife, while there was no income from the Defendant’s wife, and it is not clear whether the Defendant would receive KRW 50 million in return for the loan of construction business license.