When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who drives a frighting vehicle as his duty.

On December 10, 2015, the Defendant proceeded straightly from a long distance room of the floor, which was in front of the street of Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Seoul Special Metropolitan City”). On December 10, 2015, the Defendant continued straightly from a long distance room of the city that was a street.

When intending to drive a road on which signal lights are installed, drivers of all vehicles shall proceed along the road in accordance with the name of the place, and shall not drive any motor vehicle at a speed or in a manner that may cause any danger and impediment to others.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so, and the Defendant committed a collision between the victim C's ALIMA 3.5 vehicles and the Defendant’s above-mentioned vehicles of the victim C's ALTMA 3.5 vehicles and the Defendant, who were in the process of the front line with the front line apartment in the front line.

Accordingly, the Defendant by such negligence caused the victim C with the injury on the right ske section, the injury on the part of the victim D, the injury on the part of the victim D, who was on board the vehicle of the Defendant, requiring approximately two weeks of treatment, and the injury on the part of the right gate, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim E, the injury on the part of the right gate that requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the same victim E, the injury on the erode and the tension requiring approximately two weeks of treatment to the same victim F, the injury on the right kne part requiring approximately two weeks of treatment to the same victim G, and the injury on the part of the right kne part requiring approximately two weeks of treatment to the same victim H, and the injury on the part of the part of the part that caused the damage of the part that caused by the combination of pelf that requires approximately twelve weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A traffic accident report (1) (2) (2)

1. Investigation report (in the case of signal marking, CCTV analysis - Violation of A signalling);

1. Investigation report (the report on the violation of the suspect A's driving signal);

1. Control photographs;

1. Efaging a video and field photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 40 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition.