When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving CK5 cars.

On July 18, 2016, at around 21:35, the Defendant proceeded with the second line of way along the intersection in front of Daejeon Pungsung-gu D and Ematet, along one-lane from the direction of the Nungsung-gu office to the direction of the luctal o-distance. However, the Defendant got a U-turn.

At that place, there was an intersection where signal lights are installed, and therefore, it was a place where U-turns are prohibited, so there was a duty of care for drivers to take the front door and left door well, and to drive in line with traffic signals.

Nevertheless, even though the defendant neglected this, the defendant was driven by the victim F (25 years old) who passed the intersection in line with normal signal from the opposite opposite direction due to the negligence of the U.S., and was driven by the victim F (25 years old) as the front wheel part of the GCA100 Otoba, which was driven by the defendant.

The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, suffered injury to the victim F of the victim, to the right-hand bed for approximately seven weeks of treatment, such as fluoral pelle, and the victim H (age 45) who is the passenger of the Defendant’s vehicle, for approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F and I;

1. A traffic accident report, a survey report, and an accident site photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Punishment on the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents against LargestF);

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. A relatively large traffic accident was caused in violation of the reasoning signal for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the victim F with serious injury is disadvantageous.

The defendant is recognized to commit crimes.