beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2013.05.02 2013고단299

교통사고처리특례법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a D-math cargo vehicle belonging to C(State).

On September 24, 2012, around 09:10 on September 24, 2012, the Defendant had a duty of care to pay attention to the following: (a) on the road in front of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Eunpyeong-gu 281-60, U.S. 281-60, in the direction of the definite basin, at an infinite speed depending on the two lanes between the two lanes in the direction of the definite basin in the direction of the definite basin; (b) the Defendant had a central line installed

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and got the victim E (the 68-year old) driving a bicycle driving across the opposite direction due to the negligence of an intern beyond the center line, and the part adjacent to the left side of the bicycle operated by the victim E (the 68-year old) was in excess of the top part of the vehicle of the defendant.

In the end, the Defendant suffered injury, such as 'Apparical climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic cli

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A traffic accident occurrence report;

1. Statement on the occurrence of traffic accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, Article 3 (1) and proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act (the provision that there is no record of a fine imposed on the accused, the provision that medical expenses are paid to the victim from the Trucking Cooperative, the defendant reflects his mistake,

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;