소유권이전등기
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for cases where the same is used or added as "the part used or added by the court of first instance", and thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Parts used or added;
A. The second third party judgment of the court of first instance stated that the “Plaintiff’s deception D” in the second party judgment was “C” to “Plaintiff’s deception D and the Plaintiff’s incidental E (F).”
B. The second part of the judgment of the court of first instance “contested” in the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be construed as “contested marks or non-contested marks.”
C. The second half of the judgment of the court of first instance, “10 million won for the Plaintiff’s fraudulent D’s debts to the Plaintiff’s deceptive D’s debts to the Plaintiff’s subsidiaries,” shall be construed as “one hundred million won for the Plaintiff’s fraudulent D’s debts to the Plaintiff’s wife and E’s ancillary.”
Part 3 of the judgment of the first instance shall be referred to as "I" and "I" shall be referred to as "I".
E. Part 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance provides that "each description of evidence Nos. 8 and 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be written with "each description of evidence Nos. 5, 8 and 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance".
(f) Part 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "D" in Part 15 shall be added to "D and E".
G. The third part of the judgment of the court of first instance stated that “the presumption of the cause” in the 16-17th part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be construed as “the presumption of the cause of invalidation is broken as the registration of the invalidation of the cause.”
H. Part 8 of the fourth instance judgment of the first instance court stated “......” added the following:
In addition, the defendant asked whether E can re-transfer the real estate of this case to the plaintiff's name, and the defendant should bear a large amount of compensation when the defendant paid acquisition tax to E or re-transfer the name to E, so it should not be now now, and the statement to the effect that E cannot transfer the ownership of the real estate of this case which was provided as security until the debt is repaid to C is paid.
I. The following is added between 4th and 16 of the judgment of the first instance.
In addition, it does not seem that D has the authority or authority to dispose of the instant real estate at will.
(c).