However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 14, 2017, around 00:10, the Defendant: (a) on the street in front of the branch line C located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si; (b) on the street in front of the branch line C, the police officer belonging to the D District Police Station of the Gyeonggi-do Police Station, in receipt of the notification of the assault, arrested the Defendant as an offender of the crime of assault, and attempts to take the Defendant on board the patrol vehicle; (c) write down the door of the patrol vehicle; and (d) sound, “I see why I h h h h f h h h h h h.

Before having taken the bath of “,” the police officer, who is a police officer called “, was flicked once again, and was flicked by a police officer called “F’s bridge,” and was flicked by the said E, who met it.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the above police officers and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning criminal investigations by the police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following favorable circumstances):

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. The scope of the recommended punishment on the sentencing criteria [the scope of the recommended punishment] the basic area (six months to one year and six months) (no person in special sentencing) shall interfere with the performance of public duties;

2. Circumstances unfavorable to the decision of sentence: The punishment shall be determined as per the order, in consideration of the circumstances under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, the scope of recommended punishment in the sentencing guidelines, etc., such as the confession and reflect of the defendant, the fact that the defendant has no previous record of violence, etc., in light of the circumstances under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, the extent of recommended punishment, etc.