However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On December 8, 2018, at around 01:15, the Defendant: (a) heard the statements of the relevant persons by the police officers affiliated with the Seoul Gangseo-gu Police Station C commander of the Seoul Gangseo-gu Police Station, who was dispatched after receiving 112 reports; (b) sought the Defendant’s statement by the relevant police officers; and (c) sought to “whether the reporter, etc. was subject to violence and desire to do so from the Defendant; and (d) assaulted the chest of the said D’s chest on his own hand.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements of E, F and G;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, committed assault against the police officers dispatched after receiving a report.

Although the defendant's liability is not easy in that he/she obstructs a police officer's legitimate performance of his/her duties, it seems that he/she lives faithfully, such as the defendant's age, occupation, character and conduct, environment, motive of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc.