beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.08.27 2013고단2718

교통사고처리특례법위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for four years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 03:40 on May 22, 2013, the Defendant driving a c erosium car under the influence of alcohol at approximately 0.16% from the 12-km section of Gwangju Metropolitan City up to the 04:00-day road in front of the main road where the trade name in the downstream-dong of Gwangju Metropolitan City cannot be known, and at around 04:00 on the same day, the Defendant driven a c erosium car under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.16% from the 12-meter section to the roads in front of the

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person engaged in driving a car of C tyslon.

On May 2, 2013, at around 04:00, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol as described in paragraph (1), and led to the driving of the said car along three-lanes in front of the Bandju apartment apartment in the two villages of Seo-gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City along the direction of the luminous terminal from the direction of the dust.

At the time, the signal is installed at night and at the front, so in such cases, there was a duty of care to reduce the speed for persons engaged in driving service and to prevent accidents by checking well the situation of other vehicles waiting and stopping in the signal lights and the signal at the front.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and waited for the signal at the front, without reducing speed, at the speed of the vehicle, and driven by the victim D (the age of 58) who was under the stop, the back loaded part of the e-mail vehicle in front of the vehicle with the Defendant’s vehicle. As above, the Defendant got the victim F (the age of 27) who was under the stop at the front of the vehicle, and led the victim F (the age of 27) who was under the stop, to get the front part of the said vehicle as the front part of the said vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s occupational negligence reveals the number of days of treatment to the victim H (Monn, Wonn, 33 years of age) who was on the top of the operation of a passenger car operated by the Defendant.