However, for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant A.

Defendant

A is the representative director of the Fund in charge of the LAF operating the LAD, and Defendant B, as the managing director of the LAF, was in charge of the sale of condominium membership in China, and Defendant C was in charge of the recruitment of members in the name of China. Any person may not make an application for a visa or a visa issuance certificate to allow any foreigner to enter China, or arrange such application. On July 2017, 2017, Defendant B would make sure that he would sell 32,00,000,000, in the name of the LAF and would receive a general tourist visa (C-3-9) and would make a payment for the acquisition of acquisition tax. Defendant A, as a managing director of the LAF, was in charge of the sale of condominium membership in the name of China, and Defendant B would not have the right to sell ownership in the name of LAFD, but he would not have the right to sell ownership in the name of LAFD, which was entrusted by Defendant B to Defendant B in the name of the KAFF and the relevant documents.