2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion was from May 2009 upon the request of the Defendants, that the Plaintiff provided the Defendants’ children D and E with extra-education, and that the Plaintiff took part in the Plaintiff’s education course at the Da and E, after the Plaintiff sought to open the Boper-si F, Ansan-si. Around 2010.

Therefore, the Defendants are jointly and severally obligated to pay to the Plaintiff KRW 22,525,00 in total,00,000,000 for unpaid and unpaid foreign expenses and private teaching institutes expenses.

B. The summary of the Defendants’ assertion was that D and E, the children of the Defendants, received the education abroad from the Plaintiff and received the education abroad from the Plaintiff, but the Plaintiff and the Defendants did not have any specific agreement on the amount of extra medicine and private teaching institute fees.

In addition, the Plaintiff requested the Plaintiff to lend the operating fund after opening the Bodoing Private Teaching Institute in around 2010, and the Defendant C provided the credit card in the name of Defendant C to use it, and Defendant B provided the service at the Bodoing Private Teaching Institute operated by the Plaintiff.

On December 23, 2011, the Plaintiff and the Defendants agreed to pay KRW 11,700,000 to Defendant B, after settling the Plaintiff’s credit card use cost obligation against the Defendants, the Defendants’ reimbursement obligation equivalent to Defendant B’s reimbursement, and the Defendants’ reimbursement obligation to the Plaintiff’s extracurricular and private teaching institute expenses. Accordingly, the Plaintiff issued a promissory note of KRW 11,70,000 in face value to Defendant B, and issued a promissory note and issued it, and written the authentic deed thereof.

Therefore, the defendants do not have any obligation to pay to the plaintiff any longer.

2. Although there is no dispute between the parties that D and E, who are the children of the Defendants (the Defendants are married couple), received extra education from the Plaintiff and received education from the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff’s attending the Institute of Boperiness operated by the Plaintiff, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff’s non-paid extracurricular and private teaching institute costs amount to KRW 22,525,00,000, and there is evidence to acknowledge otherwise.