beta
(영문) 대법원 2006. 6. 16. 선고 2005도4861 판결

[공직선거및선거부정방지법위반][미간행]

Main Issues

Whether the “member of the National Assembly”, who is the subject of the regular restriction on the money and valuables for congratulations and condolences prescribed in Article 117-2 of the former Public Official Election and Prevention of Election Illegal Act, includes proportional representation (negative)

[Reference Provisions]

Article 117-2 of the former Public Official Election and Prevention of Election Illegal Act (amended by Act No. 7189 of March 12, 2004) (current Deletion)

Escopics

Defendant

upper and high-ranking persons

Prosecutor

Defense Counsel

Law Firm Bol Law, Attorney Hwang Il-ho

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2005No288 delivered on June 21, 2005

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

Article 117-2 of the former Public Official Election Act (amended by Act No. 7189, Mar. 12, 2004; hereinafter “former Public Official Election Act”) provides that National Assembly members, local council members, heads of local governments, representatives and candidates (including those who intend to become candidates) per district of a political party, and their spouses may not provide money or goods for congratulations or condolences to persons in the relevant constituency, or institutions, organizations, facilities, or persons outside the relevant constituency, regardless of whether they are related to the election, or persons who are in a relationship with the electorate, even if they are outside the relevant constituency, regardless of whether they are related to the election.

If the act of offering money and goods to the National Assembly members is prohibited, it can be divided into the current public official, persons related to political parties and Gun. The election is not included in the presidential election, but the central party whose organization and scope of activities extends over the country is not included in the representative of the district party, and it is difficult to conclude that the other party is expected to offer money and goods to all the National Assembly members or electors in relation to the restriction on the face of the above subject, regardless of the fact that the former Public Official Election Act prohibits the acts of offering money and goods to the National Assembly members in the name of the National Assembly member or the current election district. The legislative purpose of the former Public Official Election Act prohibiting the acts of offering money and goods to the National Assembly members in the name of the National Assembly member or in the name of the candidate for the National Assembly member, including the one who is prohibited from offering the money and goods to the National Assembly member by the National Assembly member or the one who is prohibited from offering the money and goods to the National Assembly member by the National Assembly member election Commission before the public official becomes a candidate for the National Assembly member.

The court below is just in the case of proportional representation of a National Assembly member, on the premise that the other party who is prohibited from offering the money and goods for congratulationss and congratulatory items as provided in Article 117-2 of the former Public Official Election Act is limited to the electorates in the area where he plans to run as a candidate, or the one who is related to his electorates, not the nationwide elector, and on the premise that there is no evidence to prove that the defendant is the electorates in the Incheon Gyeyang constituency or a person who is related to his electorates in the election for the 17th National Assembly member, and there is no error in the misapprehension of legal principles as alleged in the grounds of appeal by the court below.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Lee Hong-hoon (Presiding Justice)