If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

C Around October 201, 201, at a lending company of the trade name called "D at the time of the Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do," the Defendant owned by the Defendant with a loan of 3 million won and 2.5 million won as collateral from a lending company of the trade name "H" operated by the victim G in F at the time of the Gyeonggi-si, on January 6, 2012, and the Defendant A is a person in charge of the aforementioned "D"'s duties of customer management and demand for the repayment of debts. On March 26, 2012, the Defendant and C sold the vehicle to the victim if they were to return it to the victim and would repay the loan to the victim with the remaining money, but the victim refused to sell the above vehicle to the victim and then sold it to the victim's prospective 'D' to solve the loan by selling it to the 'D' and selling it to the 'H'. On the same day, the Defendant and C sold the vehicle to the 1728-4 member at the time of the Gyeonggi-dong on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant in collusion with C and thereby interfered with the victim's exercise of rights by taking the E-Sara car owned by C, which is the object of the victim's rights.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. An interrogation protocol of the accused by the prosecution (including the substitute part);

1. Each police interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. Statement to the Prosecutor's Office;

1. Each police statement concerning G;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of statutes to inquiries about criminal records, etc.;

1. Articles 323, 33, and 30 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.