소유권이전등기
1. Of the part against A (C) of the judgment subject to a retrial, the part corresponding to the Plaintiff (Plaintiff) shall be revoked and that part shall be revoked.
Basic Facts
The land of approximately 30,000 square meters (hereinafter “instant G Dong-dong land”) including the distribution of farmland to the instant G Dong-dong land, etc. was the first answer, but the land was forced by Japan during the Japanese occupation period, and was registered in the name of the 1942 to 1943.
However, even after the registration has been completed in the name of the State, the Gdong land was not used as a military facility or military land, but was cultivated by the original farmer as farmland, and the land category on the register remains as a rice field.
After the amendment of the Farmland Reform Act was promulgated on March 10, 1950, the farmland distribution procedure was initiated for the land of this case G Dong, and the person who received farmland distribution from the defendant was also paying part of the repayment rice from 1950 to 1952.
However, since May 1953, the Ministry of National Defense asserted ownership on the ground that the Gdong land of this case was the state-owned land managed by the Army, the defendant did not receive any more redeemable rice.
As part of the industry promotion and refugee settlement relief project on September 1, 1961, the defendant transferred the right to manage the G Dong-dong land from the Ministry of National Defense to the financial department, and had the Seoul Metropolitan Government create I.
On August 1961, Seoul Special Metropolitan City started new construction of 1,200 public houses, 1,100 simple houses, and completed relocation from August 8, 1962 to September 1962, and created J, K, K, L market, private housing land, etc. in the above G Dong group.
On June 19, 1964, 85 persons including farmers' filing civil lawsuits and winning deceaseds (hereinafter "the first plaintiffs") seek implementation of the procedure for transfer registration on the ground of completion of reimbursement against the defendant, asserting that "78,422 of the land in the Gdong in this case was distributed to them."