beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.07.12 2016누33904

추가상병불승인처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. On December 2, 2013, the Plaintiff sought the revocation of the Defendant’s non-approval of the part of the medical care and the additional non-approval of the first instance court on June 13, 2014, which was the Defendant’s non-approval of the first instance court’s non-approval of the first instance court’s non-approval of the second instance court’s non-approval of the second instance court’s non-approval of the second instance court’s non-approval of the second instance court’s non-approval of the second instance court’s non-approval of the second instance court’s medical care. The first instance court dismissed the part of the claim against the second instance court’s second instance of the second instance court’s non-approval of the medical care application ex officio, and dismissed the remainder

In this regard, the plaintiff appealed against the remaining part of the injury or disease that was dismissed, so the subject of the judgment of this court is limited to the claims concerning the left-hand part of the above injury or disease, the revolving of the back-hand part of the appeal, and the part concerning the left-hand part of the collision.

2. The reasoning of the court’s explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the second instance judgment as stated in Paragraph 3. Thus, this case is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. On the 4th 3th 3th and 10th 10th 10th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 70th 70th 70th 70th 70th 5th 5th 14th 5th 14th 5th 5th 5th 14th 5th 14th 5th 5th 5th 14th 5th 16th 16th 16th 16th 16th 16th 16th 16th 16th 16th 16th 16th 16th 16th 201.