If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

On July 4, 2012, at around 15:00, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant would work in a bank as an employee” from the victim BP operated by the victim Q Q in the BP in the Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-do.

However, in fact, there was no intention to work as an employee from a multi-party perspective.

On July 5, 2012, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 2 million won as a post office account (BS) in the name of the Defendant from the victim, and acquired it as a prepaid payment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of Q Q;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on copies of bankbooks;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;