However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 13, 2013, at least 03:40 on March 13, 2013, the Defendant used the part of the victim E (the total length) and the part of the victim E (the age of 16) with the left part of the elbbow part of the victim E (the age of 16) one time without any rashing racking the victims of the D convenience store in the Kim Sea C, and caused the victim E to suffer the injury of the part of the undeveloped part of the undeveloped part of the treatment period, and the victim F (the age of 16) with approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to F and E;

1. A written appraisal and commission;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act shall be determined by the same sentence as the order in consideration of the fact that the defendant has only the history of fines three times during the last thirty years, the extent of damage to the victims is minor, the circumstances leading to the occurrence of the case, the age, health conditions, etc. of the defendant;

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.