except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 00:50 on May 24, 2015, the Defendant received 112 report from the reporter on his name in front of the public toilets for the racing, sports ground, and sports ground in front of the Sim-si on May 24, 2015, and demanded the above police officer to present his identification card to the Defendant by deeming that the Defendant’s behavior that is behind the goods of the letobbs that are in excess of D and E belong to the police officer assigned to the racing and police station police box, which called “the drunk is fluored.” The Defendant sent the above D’s chest at two times in front of the public toilets for the racing, sports ground, and sports ground, and the Defendant called for the Defendant to present his identification card to the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports by police officers and the prevention of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of each police statement of D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the service log of a police box, and a copy of each identification card;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Reasons for sentencing of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] The basic sphere of obstruction of performance of official duties (Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties and Compelling of Duties)