2. Defendant B, C, D, E, F. upon the Plaintiff’s conjunctive claim added by this Court.

The court's explanation on this part is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore cites this part by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The court's explanation of this part of the judgment on the primary claim is the same as the statement No. 2 among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this part of the judgment is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

On May 25, 201, the Plaintiff’s assertionO agreed to transfer the land to the Plaintiff on May 25, 201. The Defendants who inherited or inherited the networkO to the Plaintiff. ① The Defendants are obligated to perform the registration procedure for transfer of ownership on the ground of an agreement on May 25, 201 with respect to the share in the purport of the preliminary claim corresponding to their shares in inheritance among the land.

Judgment

According to Gap evidence No. 4-1 (the result of the written appraisal by the court appraiser Z, it is recognized that the networkO signed in the above document, and the authenticity of the whole document is recognized), the fact that the networkO prepared and delivered to the plaintiff on May 25, 201 a written consent (hereinafter referred to as the "written consent of this case") stating that the plaintiff will not raise any objection even at any time after the transfer of ownership of the land (hereinafter referred to as the "written consent of this case") by the plaintiff.

According to the above facts, the networkO is obligated to perform the registration procedure for the transfer of ownership on May 25, 201 to the Plaintiff.

The Defendants, who inherited or inherited the deceased, also have the obligation to perform the registration procedure for ownership transfer on May 25, 201 with respect to their respective shares of inheritance among the land, < Amended by Act No. 1071, May 25, 2011>

Defendant B’s assertion: (a) around October 2014, which was after the networkO prepared the instant written consent, Defendant B received compensation for the acquisition of public land for P and Q land divided from the land; and (b) the Plaintiff did so.