However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2017. 11. 9. 18:55 경 서울 종로구 C 1 층에 있는 피해자 D 운영의 E 음식점에서 위 식당 종업원에게 진열대에 있던 닭 모래집( 일명 : 닭똥 집, 시가 2000원) 을 서비스로 달라고 요구하였으나 피해자가 이를 거절하면서 피고인을 제지하자 화가 나 위 음식점 출입구 앞에서 피해자를 향해 욕설을 하며 음식점 입구에 목발을 집어던지고 “ 동생들을 부르겠다” 고 큰소리를 치는 등 약 15분에 걸쳐 소란을 피워 위 음식점에 들어오려 던 손님들의 출입을 방해하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of CCTV image CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. On the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the sentence shall be determined as ordered in light of the following circumstances, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the arguments and records, such as the circumstances after the crime.

Unfavorable circumstances: The defendant committed the crime of this case even though he had a record of criminal punishment several times due to violent crimes.

There is no way to request the victim to seriously use a letter.

The favorable circumstances: The health conditions, etc. of the defendant shall be taken into consideration.